Volume 3, Issue 1 (March 2024)
IJER 2024, 3(1): 149-167 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rostami G, Davatgari Asl H, Asadi N. (2024). The Study of Graffiti (wall and desk writings) of Junior High School Students based on Description, Interpretation and Explanation of Critical Discourse Analysis. IJER. 3(1), 149-167. doi:10.22034/3.1.149
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-126-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-126-en.html
1- Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Ahar Branch, Ahar, Iran
2- Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Ahar Branch, Ahar, Iran ,hdavatgar@ymail.com
2- Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Ahar Branch, Ahar, Iran ,
Abstract: (855 Views)
Objective:The purpose of this research is to study the wall and desk writings from the linguistics aspects to reach students underlying and hidden layers of text, namely the relationship between power and ideology. And it brings together various ideologies within the text to achieve critical deconstruction.
Method: For this, the method of critical discourse analysis of Fairclough was used. A descriptive content analysis method was used. The data of this study is 40 writings of various junior high school students in Miyandoab. These writings were taken by camera and also was used note taking.
Results:This research was analyzed by using of the framework of critical discourse analysis approach in three layers of description, interpretation and explanation. At the descriptive level, more emphasis is placed on the lexical items and metaphorical aspects that express the students ideological perspective. At the level of interpretation, the emotional, psychological crisis and the limitations prevailing in schools and different discourses are interpreted with an intertextual connection. At the explanation stage, distress, hatred, feelings, friendship and hostility all express the emotions of the students. The position of the teacher and manager in relation to the students and their power are expressed.
Conclusion: The results showed that power of teachers ,managers and the ruling of ideology in schools caused the students to write their thoughts on the desks and walls and express the ruling discourse in school.
Method: For this, the method of critical discourse analysis of Fairclough was used. A descriptive content analysis method was used. The data of this study is 40 writings of various junior high school students in Miyandoab. These writings were taken by camera and also was used note taking.
Results:This research was analyzed by using of the framework of critical discourse analysis approach in three layers of description, interpretation and explanation. At the descriptive level, more emphasis is placed on the lexical items and metaphorical aspects that express the students ideological perspective. At the level of interpretation, the emotional, psychological crisis and the limitations prevailing in schools and different discourses are interpreted with an intertextual connection. At the explanation stage, distress, hatred, feelings, friendship and hostility all express the emotions of the students. The position of the teacher and manager in relation to the students and their power are expressed.
Conclusion: The results showed that power of teachers ,managers and the ruling of ideology in schools caused the students to write their thoughts on the desks and walls and express the ruling discourse in school.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Studies
Received: 2023/11/28 | Accepted: 2024/02/26 | Published: 2024/03/1
Received: 2023/11/28 | Accepted: 2024/02/26 | Published: 2024/03/1
References
1. Aga Golzade, F. (2004). Critical Discourse Analysis. Tehran: cultural science.
2. Aga Golzade, F. (2012). Critical Discourse Analysis and Literature. Literary Research, 1,17-27.
3. Aji Muhammad, A., Roby Salmon, A ., & Tito Y. (2019). Language Select Language Bahasa Indonesia. Parsasta Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 17-29.
4. Fahad Alyahya, A.(2019). Critical Discourse Analysis of Newspaper Articles Declaring the Outbreak of War in Ukraine: The Washington Post vs. The Moscow Times, International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, Volume 11, 2. Themed Issue on Language, Discourse, and Society, 47-59.
5. Fairclough,N .(2000). Critical Discourse Analysis: translation by Shayesteh Piran , Fatemeh and et.al (2005). Tehran: The Center of Studies and Media Research. [DOI:10.1075/dapsac.13.06fai]
6. Gasemzadeh, S.A & Gorji, M. (2012). Critical Discourse Analysis of the Novel: Dor non loved her wife more than Mosadegh. literary Research,.17, 33-63.
7. Gobadi, H. A. (2019). Analyzing the relationship between the themes of Simin Daneshvar's fictional works and Iran's cultural background. Literary Research Text Quarterly, 15,98-113.
8. Jalilifar, A., Parviz, M .,& Dan, A. (2019). Investigating the characteristics of problematic expressions in research articles and analytical texts. Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning, 24, 105-120.
9. Jingling, T.(2018). Critical Discourse Analysis of Guardian Newspaper in China military Regime, the 70th anniversary of World War II. Linguistic Research, 4, 25-56.
10. Jorgensen, M., & Philips, L .(2011). The Theory and Method at Discourse Analysis, translated by Hadi Jalili (2017),Tehran: Samt.
11. Mohammad A.A. A. (2021) .A Discourse Analysis Study of Graffiti at Secondary Schools in Jordan. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(5), 539-548. [DOI:10.17507/tpls.1105.12]
12. Naseri Sadat, Z. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis of Meshkan BouNasr Death Story based on Nourman Fairclough Perspective. Language Science, 4, 85-110.
13. Pahlavannejad, M.R ., & Naseri Mashhadi, N. (2008). The Study of a Text from Beihi History with Functional Semantic Perspective "Nam Saran Negin Abad". Mashhad Ferdowsi University Magazine, 16(62), 37-58.
14. Safavi, K. (1401). An introductory book on semantics, Tehran: Surah Mehr Publication.
15. Tahririan, M.H., & Moradi, M.M. (2013). Investigating trends and cross-cultural analysis of graffiti: silent discourse. Linguistic Essays, 3 (19), 105-139.
16. Tebe, K A ., & Fizeh, N. (2018). The Study of Cameroon Newspapers' Heading about Anglophone Crisis from the Critical Discourse Perspective of Fairclough. England Linguistics Magazine, 3, 66-83.
17. Teimuri, T., Parsa, S. A ., & Karimi, Y. (2023). Analysis of the Discourse Functions of the Novel "Year of Bloca" with the Norman Ferkalf approach. Journal LanguageResearch (Humanities), 15( 47), 157-184.
18. Yarmohammadi, L. (2003). Discourse and critics. Tehran: Hermis Publication.
19. Yule, G (2010). Applied linguistics, Translation by Mohammad Amouzadeh, Tehran: Samt
20. Zandi, B. (2014), The Study of Graffiti of Tehran County from the Sociological.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
