Volume 3, Issue 2 (June 2024)
IJER 2024, 3(2): 157-170 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nematzadeh sote P, Qanadzadegan H A, Emadian S O. (2024). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Education Based on Procrastination and Cognitive Motivational Multidimensional Intervention on Self-Efficacy of Students with Addicted Parents. IJER. 3(2), 157-170. doi:10.22034/3.2.157
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-157-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-157-en.html
1- PHD student in psychology. Sari Branch. Islamic Azad University, Iran
2- Assistant Professor. Department of Psychology. Sari Branch. Islamic Azad University. Sari. Iran ,Ghanad.hamid@yahoo.com
3- Assistant Professor. Department of Psychology. Sari Branch. Islamic Azad University. Sari. Iran
2- Assistant Professor. Department of Psychology. Sari Branch. Islamic Azad University. Sari. Iran ,
3- Assistant Professor. Department of Psychology. Sari Branch. Islamic Azad University. Sari. Iran
Abstract: (585 Views)
Objective: The current investigation was carried out to compare the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral education centered on procrastination and motivational-cognitive multidimensional intervention on the self-efficacy of students with addicted parents at the high schools of Babolsar.
Methods: The study employed a semi-experimental research design with pre-test, post-test, and follow-up assessments using an unequal control group. The target population consisted of all students with addicted parents at the high schools in Babolsar and their parents in 2022. A total of 45 individuals were purposively chosen and assigned to two experimental groups and a control group, each comprising 15 participants. The research questionnaires were administered, and cognitive-behavioral training focusing on procrastination and motivational-cognitive multidimensional intervention was conducted for the experimental groups, while the control group was placed on the waiting list for the intervention.
Results: The findings indicated that both interventions were effective in enhancing academic self-efficacy. Moreover, the impact of cognitive-behavioral training based on procrastination was found to be superior to motivational-cognitive multidimensional intervention in terms of academic self-efficacy enhancement.
Conclusions: In conclusion, both interventions exhibit potential for enhancing students' self-efficacy levels.
Methods: The study employed a semi-experimental research design with pre-test, post-test, and follow-up assessments using an unequal control group. The target population consisted of all students with addicted parents at the high schools in Babolsar and their parents in 2022. A total of 45 individuals were purposively chosen and assigned to two experimental groups and a control group, each comprising 15 participants. The research questionnaires were administered, and cognitive-behavioral training focusing on procrastination and motivational-cognitive multidimensional intervention was conducted for the experimental groups, while the control group was placed on the waiting list for the intervention.
Results: The findings indicated that both interventions were effective in enhancing academic self-efficacy. Moreover, the impact of cognitive-behavioral training based on procrastination was found to be superior to motivational-cognitive multidimensional intervention in terms of academic self-efficacy enhancement.
Conclusions: In conclusion, both interventions exhibit potential for enhancing students' self-efficacy levels.
Keywords: Cognitive-motivational intervention, Self-efficacy, Cognitive-behavioral training, Procrastination, Students
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2023/08/9 | Accepted: 2024/03/11 | Published: 2024/06/1
Received: 2023/08/9 | Accepted: 2024/03/11 | Published: 2024/06/1
References
1. Abate, S. M., Chekol, Y. A., & Minaye, S. Y. (2021). Prevalence and risk factors of psychoactive substance abuse among students in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 70, 102790. [DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102790]
2. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1]
3. De la Fuente, J., Sander, P., Garzón-Umerenkova, A., Vera-Martínez, M. M., Fadda, S., & Gaetha, M. L. (2021). Self-regulation and regulatory teaching as determinants of academic behavioral confidence and procrastination in undergraduate students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 602904. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.602904]
4. Farnia, V., Salemi, S., Mordinazar, M., Khanegi, M., Tatari, F., Golshani, S., . . . Alikhani, M. (2022). The effect of child-abuse on the behavioral problems in the children of the parents with substance use disorder: Presenting a model of structural equations. Journal of ethnicity in substance abuse, 21(2), 730-746. [DOI:10.1080/15332640.2020.1801547]
5. Howard, J. L., Bureau, J. S., Guay, F., Chong, J. X., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300-1323. [DOI:10.1177/1745691620966789]
6. Jinks, J., & Morgan, V. (1999). Children's perceived academic self-efficacy: An inventory scale. The clearing house, 72(4), 224-230. [DOI:10.1080/00098659909599398]
7. Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., & Papworth, B. (2017). Motivation and engagement: Same or different? Does it matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 150-162. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.013]
8. Martin, L. J. (2008). Team building interventions in sport: A meta-analysis.
9. Sherer, M., & Adams, C. H. (1983). Construct validation of the self-efficacy scale. Psychological reports, 53(3), 899-902. [DOI:10.2466/pr0.1983.53.3.899]
10. Tindle, R., Hamza, E. G. A., Helal, A. A., Ayoub, A. E. A., & Moustafa, A. (2021). A Systematic Review of the Psychosocial Correlates of Academic Performance. [DOI:10.31234/osf.io/frscp]
11. Tolson, J., Bartlett, D. J., Barnes, M., Rochford, P. D., Jordan, A. S., & Jackson, M. L. (2023). A randomized controlled trial of a multi-dimensional intervention to improve CPAP use and self-efficacy. Sleep Medicine, 109, 202-210. [DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2023.06.024]
12. Wäschle, K., Allgaier, A., Lachner, A., Fink, S., & Nückles, M. (2014). Procrastination and self-efficacy: Tracing vicious and virtuous circles in self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 103-114. [DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.005]
13. Yokoyama, S. (2019). Academic self-efficacy and academic performance in online learning: A mini review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2794. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02794]
14. Zarei, S., Fooladvand, K., & Zebarjadi Shabani, Z. (2022). The Effectiveness of Positive Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy on Boredom and Academic Procrastination of Female Students. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 18(4), 191-206.
15. Zhang, Y., Dong, S., Fang, W., Chai, X., Mei, J., & Fan, X. (2018). Self-efficacy for self-regulation and fear of failure as mediators between self-esteem and academic procrastination among undergraduates in health professions. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23, 817-830. [DOI:10.1007/s10459-018-9832-3]
16. Zysberg, L., & Schwabsky, N. (2021). School climate, academic self-efficacy and student achievement. Educational Psychology, 41(4), 467-482. [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2020.1813690]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
