Volume 3, Issue 3 (September 2024)
IJER 2024, 3(3): 354-365 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hosseini F, Alipour A, Safarinia M. (2024). A Meta-Diagnostic Model to Explain the Relationship Between Anxiety Intensity and Neuroticism in Anxiety Disorders: The Mediating Role of Intolerance of Uncertainty. IJER. 3(3), 354-365. doi:10.22034/3.3.354
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-297-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-297-en.html
1- Ph.D. Student in General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Psychology, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran ,alipour@pnu.ac.ir
3- Professor, Department of Psychology, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Psychology, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Professor, Department of Psychology, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (339 Views)
Objective: This study was undertaken with the objective of scrutinizing the meta-diagnostic framework to elucidate the correlation between neuroticism and the severity of anxiety in anxiety disorders, particularly highlighting the mediating influence of intolerance of uncertainty (IU).
Methods: The present study represents foundational research, characterized as correlational research design. The statistical population encompassed all female patients aged between 20 and 55 years who were afflicted with anxiety disorders who sought treatment at eight psychiatric and psychological centers in Tehran in 2022. The sample consisted of 678 individuals, which included 207 female patients (ages 20-55) diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorders, 242 female patients (ages 20-55) with social anxiety disorder, and 229 female patients (ages 20-55) diagnosed with panic disorder, all selected via purposive sampling method. The instruments employed in this research included the five-factor personality inventory, the anxiety assessment scale and the intolerance of uncertainty inventory. To process the data, the structural equation modeling approach was utilized to evaluate the fit of the proposed model.
Results: The results elucidated that the direct correlation between the severity of anxiety and both neuroticism and IU, as well as the direct relationship between IU and neuroticism, were substantiated. Moreover, the indirect relationship between the intensity of anxiety and neuroticism, mediated by IU, was corroborated.
Conclusions: This study underscores the significant role of IU in mediating the relationship between anxiety severity and neuroticism, suggesting that addressing IU may be pivotal in understanding and managing anxiety disorders more effectively.
Methods: The present study represents foundational research, characterized as correlational research design. The statistical population encompassed all female patients aged between 20 and 55 years who were afflicted with anxiety disorders who sought treatment at eight psychiatric and psychological centers in Tehran in 2022. The sample consisted of 678 individuals, which included 207 female patients (ages 20-55) diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorders, 242 female patients (ages 20-55) with social anxiety disorder, and 229 female patients (ages 20-55) diagnosed with panic disorder, all selected via purposive sampling method. The instruments employed in this research included the five-factor personality inventory, the anxiety assessment scale and the intolerance of uncertainty inventory. To process the data, the structural equation modeling approach was utilized to evaluate the fit of the proposed model.
Results: The results elucidated that the direct correlation between the severity of anxiety and both neuroticism and IU, as well as the direct relationship between IU and neuroticism, were substantiated. Moreover, the indirect relationship between the intensity of anxiety and neuroticism, mediated by IU, was corroborated.
Conclusions: This study underscores the significant role of IU in mediating the relationship between anxiety severity and neuroticism, suggesting that addressing IU may be pivotal in understanding and managing anxiety disorders more effectively.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2023/10/6 | Accepted: 2023/12/21 | Published: 2024/09/1
Received: 2023/10/6 | Accepted: 2023/12/21 | Published: 2024/09/1
References
1. Abasi, E., Fti, L., Molodi, R., & Zarabi, H. (2012). Psychometric properties of Persian Version of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire -II. Psychological Models and Methods, 3(Vol.2/No.10/Winter 2013), 65-80. https://jpmm.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_61_21af488ece7d0446040f5daca6e18c08.pdf
2. Bandelow, B., & Michaelis, S. (2015). Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 17(3), 327-335. [DOI:10.31887/DCNS.2015.17.3/bbandelow]
3. Barlow, D. H., Harris, B. A., Eustis, E. H., & Farchione, T. J. (2020). The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders. World Psychiatry, 19(2), 245. [DOI:10.1002/wps.20748]
4. Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical psychology, 56(6), 893. [DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893]
5. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Epstein, N., & Brown, G. (1990). Beck self-concept test. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2(2), 191. [DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.2.2.191]
6. Birrell, J., Meares, K., Wilkinson, A., & Freeston, M. (2011). Toward a definition of intolerance of uncertainty: A review of factor analytical studies of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Clinical psychology review, 31(7), 1198-1208. [DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.009]
7. Carleton, R. N., Gosselin, P., & Asmundson, G. J. (2010). The intolerance of uncertainty index: replication and extension with an English sample. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 396. [DOI:10.1037/a0019230]
8. Carleton, R. N., Mulvogue, M. K., Thibodeau, M. A., McCabe, R. E., Antony, M. M., & Asmundson, G. J. (2012). Increasingly certain about uncertainty: Intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety and depression. Journal of anxiety disorders, 26(3), 468-479. [DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.01.011]
9. Connor, K. M., Davidson, J. R., Churchill, L. E., Sherwood, A., Weisler, R. H., & Foa, E. (2000). Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN): New self-rating scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176(4), 379-386. [DOI:10.1192/bjp.176.4.379]
10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5. [DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5]
11. Dugas, M. J., Savard, P., Gaudet, A., Turcotte, J., Laugesen, N., Robichaud, M., . . . Koerner, N. (2007). Can the components of a cognitive model predict the severity of generalized anxiety disorder? Behavior therapy, 38(2), 169-178. [DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2006.07.002]
12. Freeston, M. H., Rhéaume, J., Letarte, H., Dugas, M. J., & Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and individual differences, 17(6), 791-802. [DOI:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90048-5]
13. Fydrich, T., Dowdall, D., & Chambless, D. L. (1992). Reliability and validity of the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Journal of anxiety disorders, 6(1), 55-61. [DOI:10.1016/0887-6185(92)90026-4]
14. Harvey, A. G., Watkins, E., & Mansell, W. (2004). Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders: A transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. Oxford University Press, USA. [DOI:10.1093/med:psych/9780198528883.001.0001]
15. Laposa, J. M., Collimore, K. C., Hawley, L. L., & Rector, N. A. (2015). Distress tolerance in OCD and anxiety disorders, and its relationship with anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty. Journal of anxiety disorders, 33, 8-14. [DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.04.003]
16. McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and individual differences, 36(3), 587-596. [DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1]
17. McEvoy, P. M., Mahoney, A. E., & Moulds, M. L. (2010). Are worry, rumination, and post-event processing one and the same?: Development of the Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire. Journal of anxiety disorders, 24(5), 509-519. [DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.008]
18. Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., Turk, C. L., & Fresco, D. M. (2002). Applying an emotion regulation framework to integrative approaches to generalized anxiety disorder. Clinical psychology: Science and practice, 9(1), 85-90. [DOI:10.1093/clipsy.9.1.85]
19. Mohammadi, M. R., Pourdehghan, P., Mostafavi, S.-A., Hooshyari, Z., Ahmadi, N., & Khaleghi, A. (2020). Generalized anxiety disorder: Prevalence, predictors, and comorbidity in children and adolescents. Journal of anxiety disorders, 73, 102234. [DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102234]
20. Outwater, A. H., Ismail, H., Mgalilwa, L., Temu, M. J., & Mbembati, N. A. (2013). Burns in Tanzania: morbidity and mortality, causes and risk factors: a review. International journal of burns and trauma, 3(1), 18.
21. Ra, Y.-A., & Trusty, J. (2015). Coping strategies for managing acculturative stress among Asian international students. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 37, 319-329. [DOI:10.1007/s10447-015-9246-3]
22. Terracciano, A., Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2006). Personality plasticity after age 30. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 32(8), 999-1009. [DOI:10.1177/0146167206288599]
23. Vahia, V. N. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5: A quick glance. Indian journal of psychiatry, 55(3), 220-223. [DOI:10.4103/0019-5545.117131]
24. Zvolensky, M. (2011). Distress tolerance: theory, research, and clinical applications. The Guilford Press.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
