Volume 3, Issue 1 (March 2024)
IJER 2024, 3(1): 88-99 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hosseini S A, Gholtash A, Ranjbar M. (2024). Presenting the Model of the Current and Desirable State of the Family Economics Curriculum in the Second Level of High School in Iran. IJER. 3(1), 88-99. doi:10.22034/3.1.88
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-71-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-71-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Curriculum planning, Faculty of Humanities, Lamerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lamerd, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran ,gholtash578@yahoo.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Lamard Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lamard, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran ,
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Lamard Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lamard, Iran
Abstract: (824 Views)
Objective: The aim of this study was to construct a model delineating the existing and preferred configuration of the family economics curriculum at the secondary level of high schools in Iran.
Methods: The qualitative segment of the study adhered to grounded theory, while the quantitative aspect adopted a descriptive survey approach. The study participants comprised experts within the field, selected through non-random sampling techniques such as the snowball method. Semi-structured interviews were conducted until reaching theoretical data saturation, involving 30 individuals. In the quantitative phase, a researcher-developed questionnaire was utilized to assess the current and desirable states of the family economics curriculum model. Experts were sampled using a simple random method, resulting in a sample size of 118 participants.
Results: The outcomes indicated that the various dimensions and components of family economics education for students encompassed family education, individual factors, societal economic perspectives, social influences, appropriate educational content for enhanced comprehension of economic principles, conducive learning environments, life skills, and pedagogical approaches to economic concepts.
Conclusions: In conclusion, the prevailing condition of the family economics curriculum at the secondary level of high schools in Iran demonstrated a positive status.
Methods: The qualitative segment of the study adhered to grounded theory, while the quantitative aspect adopted a descriptive survey approach. The study participants comprised experts within the field, selected through non-random sampling techniques such as the snowball method. Semi-structured interviews were conducted until reaching theoretical data saturation, involving 30 individuals. In the quantitative phase, a researcher-developed questionnaire was utilized to assess the current and desirable states of the family economics curriculum model. Experts were sampled using a simple random method, resulting in a sample size of 118 participants.
Results: The outcomes indicated that the various dimensions and components of family economics education for students encompassed family education, individual factors, societal economic perspectives, social influences, appropriate educational content for enhanced comprehension of economic principles, conducive learning environments, life skills, and pedagogical approaches to economic concepts.
Conclusions: In conclusion, the prevailing condition of the family economics curriculum at the secondary level of high schools in Iran demonstrated a positive status.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Studies
Received: 2023/02/19 | Accepted: 2023/12/1 | Published: 2024/03/1
Received: 2023/02/19 | Accepted: 2023/12/1 | Published: 2024/03/1
References
1. Basirati Barzaki, Z., Mahrozadeh, T., & Banahan, M. (2015). A comparative study of the economic-professional goals of the document of fundamental transformation of the Iranian educational system and the Japanese educational system (MEXT) at the primary level and its implementation solutions Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Al-Zahra University (S)]. Tehran.
2. Becker Jr, W. E., & Walstad, R. A. (2012). Econometric modeling in economic education research (Vol. 2). Springer Science & Business Media.
3. Cseh-Papp, I., & Varga, E. (2017). History of the Hungarian economic training. Journal of process management and new technologies, 5(2). [DOI:10.5937/jouproman5-13507]
4. Dale, R. (2000). Globalization and education: demonstrating a" common world educational culture" or locating a" globally structured educational agenda"? Educational Theory, 50(4), 427. [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2000.00427.x]
5. Ghandhaari, A., Mehrmohammadi, M., Talaa'ee, E., & Faraji Dizaji, S. (2019). A Comparative Study of Economic Training as a Component of Elementary School Curriculum in Scotland, China, and Australia, and its Implications for Such a Training in Iran [Research]. Quarterly Journal Of Education, 35(3), 59-78. http://qjoe.ir/article-1-1953-fa.html
6. Greenspan, A. (2003). The importance of financial and economic education and literacy.(Raising Interest in Economics). Social Education, 67(2), 70-72.
7. Grimes, P. W., Rogers, K. E., & Bosshardt, W. D. (2021). Economic education and household financial outcomes during the financial crisis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(7), 316. [DOI:10.3390/jrfm14070316]
8. Gültekin, M., Anılan, H., & Kılıç, Z. (2010). Teachers and students' views on the teaching and learning process of the social studies course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2744-2749. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.407]
9. Hastings, J. S., Madrian, B. C., & Skimmyhorn, W. L. (2013). Financial literacy, financial education, and economic outcomes. Annu. Rev. Econ., 5(1), 347-373. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-economics-082312-125807]
10. Hendaryati, N. (2015). Family Economy and Its Implementation on Compulsory Education Program. Dinamika Pendidikan, 10(2), 104-109.
11. Leiser, D., Benita, R., & Bourgeois-Gironde, S. (2016). Differing conceptions of the causes of the economic crisis: Effects of culture, economic training, and personal impact. Journal of Economic Psychology, 53, 154-163. [DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2016.02.002]
12. Miller, J. (2015). Contemplative education. In (pp. 1541344615608465): SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
13. Mirarab, r., hajitabar, m., & Arianfar, s. (2019). Analysis of Economic Literacy Components of Secondary School Textbooks from the Viewpoint of Teachers and Students. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 7(14), 121-132. [DOI:10.22080/eps.1970.2128]
14. Mosazadeh, Z., & Sanati, F. (2017). Elucidation of economic education parameters based on Islamic teachings. Journal of Islamic Education, 12(24), 73-97.
15. Narmaditya, B. S., & Wibowo, A. (2021). Family economic education, peer groups and students' entrepreneurial intention: the mediating role of economic literacy. Heliyon, 7(4). [DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06692]
16. Rakhimov, A. R. (2018). Requirements for Economic Training of College Students in Modern Professional Education. Eastern European Scientific Journal(2).
17. Schafer, M. J., & Khan, S. S. (2017). Family economy, rural school choice, and flexischooling children with disabilities. Rural Sociology, 82(3), 524-547. [DOI:10.1111/ruso.12132]
18. Semenov, V. P. (2017). Development and usage of electronic teaching technologies for the economic training of students in a technical university. 2017 International Conference" Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies"(IT&QM&IS), [DOI:10.1109/ITMQIS.2017.8085916]
19. Suciu, C. M., & Staiculescu, C. (2010). ECONOMIC EDUCATION SCHOOL-BASED CURRICULUM AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES IN PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION. Euromentor Journal, 1(4), 135-146.
20. Thompson, M. (2012). Foucault, fields of governability, and the population-family-economy nexus in China. History and theory, 51(1), 42-62. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00611.x]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
