Volume 4, Issue 1 (March 2025)
IJER 2025, 4(1): 77-88 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bakhtiari G, Naseri N, Ghorbani M. (2025). Identifying and Prioritizing Dimensions of the Organizational Learning Model in Teachers of University of Applied Science and Technology. IJER. 4(1), 77-88. doi:10.22034/4.1.77
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-204-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-204-en.html
1- Department of Educational Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Educational Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran ,naseri5586@mshdiau.ac.ir
2- Department of Educational Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran ,
Abstract: (1483 Views)
Objective: The purpose of this research was to identify and prioritize the dimensions of the organizational learning model in teachers of university of applied science and technology.
Methods: This research employed a mixed methodology, specifically an exploratory sequential mixed design, which was executed in two distinct phases: qualitative and quantitative. The qualitative aspect of the statistical population comprised the managerial and vice-presidential personnel at Razavi Khorasan Scientific-Applied University, along with university professors and domain experts, who were selected through purposive sampling, totaling 25 individuals. In the quantitative segment, the dimensions and components were derived from the interviews and subsequently formulated into a questionnaire, which was disseminated among the lecturer population of Razavi Khorasan Scientific and Applied University, numbering 3,680 individuals. Based on Morgan's table, a sample size of 351 individuals was determined. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were employed for data analysis, while the qualitative phase utilized the Delphi method. Ultimately, structural equation modeling was applied to address the primary research question and assess the model's fit to the data.
Results: The results indicated that organizational learning encompasses four dimensions (commitment, continuous learning, empowerment, and knowledge management) and 19 components, with the dimensions of empowerment, commitment, knowledge management, and continuous learning ranked from first to fourth priority, respectively.
Conclusions: Consequently, it is imperative for managers and officials to establish a system that enables professors to remain abreast of contemporary information, knowledge, theories, and research findings.
Methods: This research employed a mixed methodology, specifically an exploratory sequential mixed design, which was executed in two distinct phases: qualitative and quantitative. The qualitative aspect of the statistical population comprised the managerial and vice-presidential personnel at Razavi Khorasan Scientific-Applied University, along with university professors and domain experts, who were selected through purposive sampling, totaling 25 individuals. In the quantitative segment, the dimensions and components were derived from the interviews and subsequently formulated into a questionnaire, which was disseminated among the lecturer population of Razavi Khorasan Scientific and Applied University, numbering 3,680 individuals. Based on Morgan's table, a sample size of 351 individuals was determined. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were employed for data analysis, while the qualitative phase utilized the Delphi method. Ultimately, structural equation modeling was applied to address the primary research question and assess the model's fit to the data.
Results: The results indicated that organizational learning encompasses four dimensions (commitment, continuous learning, empowerment, and knowledge management) and 19 components, with the dimensions of empowerment, commitment, knowledge management, and continuous learning ranked from first to fourth priority, respectively.
Conclusions: Consequently, it is imperative for managers and officials to establish a system that enables professors to remain abreast of contemporary information, knowledge, theories, and research findings.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Studies
Received: 2023/09/15 | Accepted: 2024/05/23 | Published: 2025/03/1
Received: 2023/09/15 | Accepted: 2024/05/23 | Published: 2025/03/1
References
1. Araei, M., & Mohammadi Mehr, M. (2022). The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning in the Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Innovation (Case Study: Faculty Members of a Military University). Journal of Military Medicine, 22(4), 373-383. [DOI:10.30491/jmm.22.4.7]
2. Banerjee, P., Gupta, R., & Bates, R. (2017). Influence of organizational learning culture on knowledge worker's motivation to transfer training: Testing moderating effects of learning transfer climate. Current Psychology, 36, 606-617. [DOI:10.1007/s12144-016-9449-8]
3. Dee, J. R., & Leišytė, L. (2016). Organizational learning in higher education institutions: Theories, frameworks, and a potential research agenda. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 275-348. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-26829-3_6]
4. Farhad, S., Pardakhtchi, M. H., & Sabbaghiyan, Z. (2020). Identifying the effective factors and components in transferring learning to the work environment in in-service training of nurses in hospitals affiliated to the Social Security Organization [Survey/Cross Sectional/Descriptive]. Medical Sciences Journal of Islamic Azad University, 30(1), 82-91. [DOI:10.29252/iau.30.1.82]
5. Ghorbankhani, M., & Salehi, K. (2017). Representation the characteristics of the successful Professors in the virtual education in Iran's higher education system from the viewpoint of students and professors, a phenomenological study. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 11(3), 235-255. [DOI:10.22061/tej.2017.683]
6. Gomes, G., & Wojahn, R. M. (2017). Organizational learning capability, innovation and performance: study in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMES). Revista de Administração (São Paulo), 52, 163-175. [DOI:10.1016/j.rausp.2016.12.003]
7. Guraya, S. Y., & Chen, S. (2019). The impact and effectiveness of faculty development program in fostering the faculty's knowledge, skills, and professional competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi journal of biological sciences, 26(4), 688-697. [DOI:10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.024]
8. Gurbani Niti, M., Qasemzadeh Alishahi, A., & Barqi, E. (2020). The role of dimensions of organizational learning climate and personal learning orientation on the professional learning of employees of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Depiction of Health, 11(1), 74-86. [DOI:10.34172/doh.2020.08]
9. Hyatt, L., & Williams, P. E. (2011). 21st century competencies for doctoral leadership faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 53-66. [DOI:10.1007/s10755-010-9157-5]
10. Khunsoonthornkit, A., & Panjakajornsak, V. (2018). Structural equation model to assess the impact of learning organization and commitment on the performance of research organizations. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 457-462. [DOI:10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.003]
11. Marzoghi, R., Hasanzadeh, S., Jahani, J., & Torkzadeh, J. (2022). Analysis of Internal, External and Institutional Structure in the Effectiveness of Tourism Education Courses: A study Based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology Journal, 4(4), 243-251. [DOI:10.52547/ieepj.4.4.243]
12. Moon, H., Ruona, W., & Valentine, T. (2017). Organizational strategic learning capability: exploring the dimensions. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(3), 222-240. [DOI:10.1108/EJTD-08-2016-0061]
13. Oosthuizen, L., & van der Bijl, A. (2019). Maintenance of Industry Skills and Knowledge by Vocational Lecturers at South African Technical and Vocational Education and Training Colleges. 2nd International Conference on Tourism Research,
14. Poorkarimi, J., Keramati, M. R., & Mohammadi, A. R. (2017). Identifying and Determining Professional Competencies of Human Resources Experts. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 26(86), 61-96. [DOI:10.22054/jmsd.2017.8443]
15. Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. (2009). Organizational learning and knowledge in public service organizations: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 463-494. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00257.x]
16. Saadati, P., Ghorbani, M., & Khayatmoghadam, S. (2022). The Role of Organizational Capabilities on Organizational Learning in Employees of The Razavi Khorasan General Directorate of Education: A Case Study. Iranian Evolutionary Educational Psychology Journal, 4(3), 645-655.
17. Sajjadi, S. A., Razavi, S. M. H., & Kordlo, H. (2019). The effect of organizational learning capabilities on organizational entrepreneurship in the Ministry of Sports and Youth of Iran. Journal of Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 15(30), 241-255. [DOI:10.22080/jsmb.2017.1868]
18. Sanjari, M., Esmaeili, M. R., & Tojari, F. (2020). Relationship Between Organizational Learning with Self Efficacy and Work Engagement in Sports and Youth Offices of Markazi Province. Sport Management Studies, 12(59), 251-268. [DOI:10.22089/smrj.2020.1982]
19. Timuranjad, K., & Sarihi Sofestani, R. (2010). Effects of Organizational Learning on Psychological Empowerment, in the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 20(62), 37-59.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
