Volume 1, Issue 1 (March 2022)
IJER 2022, 1(1): 67-75 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zare Mahdiabadi F, Mohammadi K. (2022). Modeling the relationships between quality of academic life and academic engagement: mediating role of academic self-efficacy. IJER. 1(1), 67-75. doi:10.52547/ijer.1.1.67
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-27-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-27-en.html
1- MA in Family Counseling, Department of Psychology, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran , fatemezare.psy@gmail.com
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran
Abstract: (499 Views)
Academic life quality of university students and academic self-efficacy are among the important variables that affect the academic engagement in college students. The current study aimed to develop a model to reveal the direct and indirect relationships between academic life quality, academic self-efficacy, and the academic engagement in college students. The research sample comprised 380 male and female students from the Faculty of Humanities at University of Hormozgan. Academic life quality, academic self-efficacy and academic engagement questionnaires were used for data collection. The results indicated that the proposed structural model benefited from a satisfactory goodness-of-fit level with the study data. According the results, the research variables had direct and indirect relationships. The findings also confirmed that self-efficacy mediated the relationship between academic quality of life and academic engagement. Implications and research recommendations are provided for future studies as well.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2022/01/13 | Accepted: 2022/02/26 | Published: 2022/03/1
Received: 2022/01/13 | Accepted: 2022/02/26 | Published: 2022/03/1
References
1. Abdellatif, M. S. (2022). Modeling the Relationships Between Academic Boredom, Self-Compassion, and Quality of Academic Life Among University Students. SAGE Open, 12(4), 21582440221141703. [DOI:10.1177/21582440221141703]
2. Adams, A.-M., Wilson, H., Money, J., Palmer-Conn, S., & Fearn, J. (2020). Student engagement with feedback and attainment: the role of academic self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 317-329. [DOI:10.1080/02602938.2019.1640184]
3. Akanni, A. A., & Oduaran, C. A. (2018). Perceived social support and life satisfaction among freshmen: Mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic adjustment. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 28(2), 89-93. [DOI:10.1080/14330237.2018.1454582]
4. Alrashidi, O., Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2016). Academic Engagement: An Overview of Its Definitions, Dimensions, and Major Conceptualisations. International Education Studies, 9(12), 41-52. [DOI:10.5539/ies.v9n12p41]
5. Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J.-S., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 651-670. [DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007]
6. Baron, P., & Corbin, L. (2012). Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 759-772. [DOI:10.1080/07294360.2012.655711]
7. Brint, S., Cantwell, A. M., & Hanneman, R. A. (2008). The two cultures of undergraduate academic engagement. Research in higher education, 49(5), 383-402. [DOI:10.1007/s11162-008-9090-y]
8. Carmona-Halty, M. A., Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2019). The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-9S): Factorial validity, reliability, and measurement invariance in a Chilean sample of undergraduate university students. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1017. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01017]
9. Dogan, U. (2015). Student engagement, academic self-efficacy, and academic motivation as predictors of academic performance. The Anthropologist, 20(3), 553-561. [DOI:10.1080/09720073.2015.11891759]
10. Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in developmental disabilities, 16(1), 51-74. [DOI:10.1016/0891-4222(94)00028-8]
11. García-Martínez, I., Landa, J. M. A., & León, S. P. (2021). The mediating role of engagement on the achievement and quality of life of university students. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(12), 6586. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18126586]
12. Kaplan, R. M., & Ries, A. L. (2007). Quality of life: concept and definition. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 4(3), 263-271. [DOI:10.1080/15412550701480356]
13. Lam, S.-f., Wong, B. P., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2012). Understanding student engagement with a contextual model. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 403-419). Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_19]
14. Lewis, A. D., Huebner, E. S., Malone, P. S., & Valois, R. F. (2011). Life satisfaction and student engagement in adolescents. Journal of youth and adolescence, 40(3), 249-262. [DOI:10.1007/s10964-010-9517-6]
15. McKee, C. W., & Tew, W. M. (2013). Setting the stage for teaching and learning in American higher education: Making the case for faculty development. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 133, 3-14. [DOI:10.1002/tl.20041]
16. Nielsen, T., Dammeyer, J., Vang, M. L., & Makransky, G. (2018). Gender fairness in self-efficacy? A Rasch-based validity study of the General Academic Self-efficacy scale (GASE). Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 664-681. [DOI:10.1080/00313831.2017.1306796]
17. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115. [DOI:10.1037/a0013383]
18. Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259-282). Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12]
19. Sharma, B. R., & Bhaumik, P. K. (2013). Student engagement and its predictors: An exploratory study in an Indian business school. Global business review, 14(1), 25-42. [DOI:10.1177/0972150912466364]
20. Vizoso, C., Rodríguez, C., & Arias-Gundín, O. (2018). Coping, academic engagement and performance in university students. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1515-1529. [DOI:10.1080/07294360.2018.1504006]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
