Volume 3, Issue 4 (December 2024)
IJER 2024, 3(4): 385-404 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sharifi F, Sepehri M, Shafiee S. (2024). The Practicality of Dynamic Assessment in Reading Comprehension Strategies and Reading Motivation: Mirroring ESP Students' Attitudes. IJER. 3(4), 385-404. doi:10.22034/3.4.385
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-295-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-295-en.html
1- Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
2- Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran, ,m.sepehri@iaushk.ac.ir
2- Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran, ,
Abstract: (338 Views)
Objective: This study investigated the effects of dynamic assessment (DA) on Iranian ESP university students' reading comprehension strategies and motivation. Furthermore, the views of Iranian ESP university students concerning DA were examined.
Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental methodology to recruit 80 Ph.D. students as the sample. The participants were separated into two groups: control (CG) and experimental (EG). Then, two questionnaires about metacognitive strategies and reading motivation (RM) were delivered to them. Following that, the sandwich style of DA was used to educate the EG to read psychological materials while the CG was trained in the traditional manner. After teaching 13 texts to the groups, the aforesaid questionnaires were administered again, together with the attitude questionnaire, to determine the impact of the intervention and to better comprehend the participants’ opinions regarding the use of DA.
Results: The findings of the ANCOVA test showed that the EG outperformed the CG on the two post-tests of reading comprehension techniques and motivation. Furthermore, the findings of the one-sample t-test demonstrated that Iranian ESP university students had positive attitudes regarding DA.
Conclusions: The study highlights that dynamic assessment (DA) effectively improves reading comprehension strategies and motivation among Iranian ESP students, with the experimental group outperforming the control group. Participants also expressed positive attitudes toward DA, emphasizing its potential as a valuable instructional method.
Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental methodology to recruit 80 Ph.D. students as the sample. The participants were separated into two groups: control (CG) and experimental (EG). Then, two questionnaires about metacognitive strategies and reading motivation (RM) were delivered to them. Following that, the sandwich style of DA was used to educate the EG to read psychological materials while the CG was trained in the traditional manner. After teaching 13 texts to the groups, the aforesaid questionnaires were administered again, together with the attitude questionnaire, to determine the impact of the intervention and to better comprehend the participants’ opinions regarding the use of DA.
Results: The findings of the ANCOVA test showed that the EG outperformed the CG on the two post-tests of reading comprehension techniques and motivation. Furthermore, the findings of the one-sample t-test demonstrated that Iranian ESP university students had positive attitudes regarding DA.
Conclusions: The study highlights that dynamic assessment (DA) effectively improves reading comprehension strategies and motivation among Iranian ESP students, with the experimental group outperforming the control group. Participants also expressed positive attitudes toward DA, emphasizing its potential as a valuable instructional method.
Keywords: Attitude, Dynamic Assessment, Metacognitive Reading Comprehension Strategies, Reading Motivation
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Studies
Received: 2024/02/28 | Accepted: 2024/06/25 | Published: 2024/12/1
Received: 2024/02/28 | Accepted: 2024/06/25 | Published: 2024/12/1
References
1. Ahmadpour, L. & Asadollahfam, H. (2018). The effects of dynamic assessment and gender on EFL learners' oral narrative task performance. International Journal of Language Testing and Assessment, 1(1), 12-24. [DOI:10.24815/ijolta.v1i1.9773]
2. Crick, R. D., & Yu, G. (2008). Assessing learning dispositions: Is the effective lifelong learning inventory valid and reliable as a measurement tool? Educational Research, 50(4), 387-402. [DOI:10.1080/00131880802499886]
3. Gunobgunob-Mirasol, R. (2019). Vocabulary Size, Reading Motivation, Reading Attitudes and Reading Comprehension Performance among Filipino College Learners of English. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(1), 64-70. [DOI:10.11591/ijere.v8i1.15335]
4. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research. (Vol. III, pp. 403-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Kozulin, A. (2003). Psychological tools and mediated learning. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 15-38). New York: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511840975.003]
6. Lantolf, J. Sociocultural Theory and Second and Foreign Language Learning: An Overview of Sociocultural Theory. New Insights into Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, 9, 13-34.
7. Lantolf, J., & Poehner, M.E. (2014). Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education: Vygotskian Praxis and the Research/practice Divide. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203813850]
8. Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (2012). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development (Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, China2012).
9. Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2018). Metacognition and metacognitive instruction in second language writing classrooms. TESOL Q. 52, 1085-1097. doi: 10.1002/tesq.436 [DOI:10.1002/tesq.436]
10. Lin, D., Wong, K. K., & McBride-Chang, C. (2012). Reading motivation and reading comprehension in Chinese and English among bilingual students. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 717-737. [DOI:10.1007/s11145-011-9297-8]
11. Lumettu, A., & Runtuwene, T.L. (2018). Developing the students' English-speaking ability through impromptu speaking method. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 953(1). [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012035]
12. Malmir, A., & Mazloom, P. (2021). The Impact of Group Dynamic Assessment (GDA) vs. Computerised Dynamic Assessment (C-DA) on Iranian EFL Learners' Pragmatic Comprehension. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 9(1), 67-94.
13. Mardani, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). Beyond Reading Comprehension: The Effect of Adding a Dynamic Assessment Component on EFL Reading Comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 2(3), 45-59. [DOI:10.4304/jltr.2.3.688-696]
14. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115. [DOI:10.1037/a0013383]
15. Phakiti, A. (2008). Construction Validation of Bachman and Palmer's model (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests. Language Testing, 25(2), 237-272. [DOI:10.1177/0265532207086783]
16. Phakiti, A. (2016). Test takers' performance appraisals, appraisal calibration, and cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(2), 75-108. [DOI:10.1080/15434303.2016.1154555]
17. Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Berlin: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-75775-9]
18. Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized DA(C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323-342. [DOI:10.1177/1362168813482935]
19. Poehner, M.E., & Infante, P. (2017). Mediated development: A Vygotskian approach to transforming second language learner abilities. TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), 332-357. [DOI:10.1002/tesq.308]
20. Purpura, J. E. (1999). Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modeling approach. Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1177%2F026553229801500303]
21. Regan, V. (1998). Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition in social context. University College Dublin Press.
22. Ro, E. (2016). Exploring teachers' practices and students' perceptions of the extensive reading approach in EAP reading classes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 32-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.006]
23. Rosenfeld, M., Leung, S., & Oilman, P. K. (2001). The Reading, writing, speaking, and listening tasks important for academic success at the undergraduate and graduate levels (TOEFL Monograph Series, No. 21). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
24. Safdari, M., & Fathi, J. (2020). Investigating the role of dynamic assessment on speaking accuracy and fluency of pre-intermediate EFL learners. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1818924, [DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2020.1818924]
25. Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427-463. [DOI:10.1002/RRQ.030]
26. Seymour, S., & Walsh, L. (2006). Essentials of teaching academic reading. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
27. Shrestha, P. N. (2017). Investigating the learning transfer of genre features and conceptual knowledge from an academic literacy course to business studies: Exploring the potential of dynamic assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 25(25), 1-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2016.10.002]
28. Siwathaworn, P., & Wudthayagorn, J. (2018). The impact of dynamic assessment on tertiary EFL students' speaking skills. Asian J. Appl. Linguist. 5, 142-155
29. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. Handbook of Reading Research, 3, 403-422.
30. Xi, J, & Lantolf, J.P. (2021). Scaffolding and the Zone of Proximal Development: A Problematic Relationship. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 51(1), 25-48. [DOI:10.1111/jtsb.12260]
31. Zarei, A.A., & Shishegarha, E. (2023). The Effects of Dynamic Assessment Models on L2 Listening and Speaking Anxiety. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Language Horizons, Alzahra University, 5, 33-47.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
