Volume 4, Issue 3 (September 2025)
IJER 2025, 4(3): 1-14 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Molaei S, Kouroshnia M, Zarnaghash M. (2025). Examining Mediating role of Gender Roles in the Relationship between Family Communication Orientation and Resilience. IJER. 4(3), 1-14.
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-336-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-336-en.html
1- Educational Psychology Department, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
2- Psychology Department, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran ,ma.kouroshnia@iau.ac.ir
3- Psychology Department, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
2- Psychology Department, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran ,
3- Psychology Department, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
Abstract: (1829 Views)
Objective: The primary objective of the current investigation was to examine the correlation between the dimensions of family communication patterns and psychological resilience, with a focus on the mediating role of gender roles.
Methods: The methodological framework employed in this study was correlational, specifically utilizing structural equation modeling. The statistical sample for this research encompassed students from Shiraz University and Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman in the year 2022, from which a total of 388 students (comprising 221 females and 167 males) were selected to participate in the completion of Ritchie and Fitzpatrick's Revised Family Communication Patterns Instrument, the abbreviated version of the Bem Gender Role Inventory, and the Freiburg et al. Elder Resilience Inventory.
Results: The results derived from the structural model analysis indicated that conversation orientation exerts a positive direct effect on resilience, whereas conformity orientation demonstrates a negative direct effect on resilience. Furthermore, conversation orientation significantly influences resilience through the mediation of both male and female gender roles. In contrast, conformity orientation does not exhibit a significant indirect effect on resilience via male and female gender roles.
Conclusions: In light of these findings, it can be inferred that familial relationships characterized by conversational engagement facilitate the development of male and female gender roles in individuals, thereby enhancing their ability to effectively navigate challenges.
Methods: The methodological framework employed in this study was correlational, specifically utilizing structural equation modeling. The statistical sample for this research encompassed students from Shiraz University and Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman in the year 2022, from which a total of 388 students (comprising 221 females and 167 males) were selected to participate in the completion of Ritchie and Fitzpatrick's Revised Family Communication Patterns Instrument, the abbreviated version of the Bem Gender Role Inventory, and the Freiburg et al. Elder Resilience Inventory.
Results: The results derived from the structural model analysis indicated that conversation orientation exerts a positive direct effect on resilience, whereas conformity orientation demonstrates a negative direct effect on resilience. Furthermore, conversation orientation significantly influences resilience through the mediation of both male and female gender roles. In contrast, conformity orientation does not exhibit a significant indirect effect on resilience via male and female gender roles.
Conclusions: In light of these findings, it can be inferred that familial relationships characterized by conversational engagement facilitate the development of male and female gender roles in individuals, thereby enhancing their ability to effectively navigate challenges.
Keywords: Psychological resilience, Family communication patterns, Gender roles, University students
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2024/11/27 | Accepted: 2025/02/9 | Published: 2025/09/10
Received: 2024/11/27 | Accepted: 2025/02/9 | Published: 2025/09/10
References
1. Amin, S., Haroon Rashidi, H., & Kazemian Moghadam, K. (2022). Investigating Parenting Styles and Family Relationship Patterns with Addiction to Virtual Networks: The Mediating Role of Social Competence in Dezful City Students. The Women and Families Cultural-Educational, 17(58), 133-157. https://cwfs.ihu.ac.ir/article_207166_9cb6fea4c94bede013f67677da931dff.pdf
2. Beall, A., & Sternberg, R. (1993). The psychology of gender New York. In: Guilford Press.
3. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological review, 88(4), 354. [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354]
4. Benzies, K., & Mychasiuk, R. (2009). Fostering family resiliency: A review of the key protective factors. Child & Family Social Work, 14(1), 103-114. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00586.x]
5. Best, D. L., & Williams, J. E. (2001). Gender and culture. The handbook of culture and psychology, 195-219.
6. Brems, C., & Johnson, M. E. (1989). Problem-solving appraisal and coping style: The influence of sex-role orientation and gender. The Journal of Psychology, 123(2), 187-194. [DOI:10.1080/00223980.1989.10542975]
7. Buchanan, A. (2014). Risk and protective factors in child development and the development of resilience. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(4), 244-249. [DOI:10.4236/jss.2014.24025]
8. Cheung, F. M. (1996). Gender role development. Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development, 45-67.
9. Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor‐Davidson resilience scale (CD‐RISC). Depression and anxiety, 18(2), 76-82. [DOI:10.1002/da.10113]
10. Dean, M. L., & Tate, C. C. (2017). Extending the legacy of Sandra Bem: Psychological androgyny as a touchstone conceptual advance for the study of gender in psychological science. Sex Roles, 76(11), 643-654. [DOI:10.1007/s11199-016-0713-z]
11. Eisend, M. (2019). Gender roles. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 72-80. [DOI:10.1080/00913367.2019.1566103]
12. Ellis, B. J., Bianchi, J., Griskevicius, V., & Frankenhuis, W. E. (2017). Beyond risk and protective factors: An adaptation-based approach to resilience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 561-587. [DOI:10.1177/1745691617693054]
13. Epstein, C. F. (1997). The multiple realities of sameness and difference: Ideology and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 53(2), 259-277. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02443.x]
14. Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Koerner, A. F. (2005). Family communication schemata: Effects on children's resiliency. The evolution of key mass communication concepts: Honoring Jack M. McLeod, 115-139.
15. Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Ritchie, L. D. (1994). Communication schemata within the family: Multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20(3), 275-301. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00324.x]
16. Friborg, O., Barlaug, D., Martinussen, M., Rosenvinge, J. H., & Hjemdal, O. (2005). Resilience in relation to personality and intelligence. International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 14(1), 29-42. [DOI:10.1002/mpr.15]
17. Greeff, A. P., & Human, B. (2004). Resilience in families in which a parent has died. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 32(1), 27-42. [DOI:10.1080/01926180490255765]
18. Higgins, G. O. C. (1994). Resilient adults: Overcoming a cruel past. Jossey-Bass.
19. Hornor, G. (2017). Resilience. Journal of pediatric health care, 31(3), 384-390. [DOI:10.1016/j.pedhc.2016.09.005]
20. Jowkar, B., Friborg, O., & Hjemdal, O. (2010). Cross‐cultural validation of the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) in Iran. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 51(5), 418-425. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00794.x]
21. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
22. Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives, 50-65. [DOI:10.4135/9781452204420.n4]
23. Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2012). Communication in intact families. In The Routledge handbook of family communication (pp. 141-156). Routledge.
24. Kohlberg, L. (1966). Moral education in the schools: A developmental view. The School Review, 74(1), 1-30. [DOI:10.1086/442759]
25. Korabik, K., & McCreary, D. R. (2000). Testing a model of socially desirable and undesirable gender-role attributes. Sex Roles, 43(9), 665-685. [DOI:10.1023/A:1007104624752]
26. Koroshnia, M., & Latifian, M. (2007). Examining the validity and reliability of the revised Family Communication Patterns Instrument. Journal of Family Research, 3(4), 1-21. https://jfr.sbu.ac.ir/article_95009_369f72740e4352e6823f4066832c6d9a.pdf
27. Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2017). Understanding and undermining the development of gender dichotomies: The legacy of Sandra Lipsitz Bem. Sex Roles, 76(9), 544-555. [DOI:10.1007/s11199-015-0519-4]
28. Nath, P., & Pradhan, R. K. (2012). Influence of positive affect on physical health and psychological well-being: Examining the mediating role of psychological resilience. Journal of Health Management, 14(2), 161-174. [DOI:10.1177/097206341201400206]
29. Newman, T., & Blackburn, S. (2002). Transitions in the Lives of Children and Young People: Resilience Factors. Interchange 78.
30. Regan, P. C., & Berscheid, E. (1995). Gender differences in beliefs about the causes of male and female sexual desire. Personal relationships, 2(4), 345-358. [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00097.x]
31. Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2016). Gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for STEM education and approaches to reducing the gender gap for parents and educators. In Visual-spatial ability in STEM education: Transforming research into practice (pp. 195-224). Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-44385-0_10]
32. Shansky, R. M. (2015). Sex differences in PTSD resilience and susceptibility: Challenges for animal models of fear learning. Neurobiology of stress, 1, 60-65. [DOI:10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.09.005]
33. Vaishnavi, S., Connor, K., & Davidson, J. R. (2007). An abbreviated version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the CD-RISC2: Psychometric properties and applications in psychopharmacological trials. Psychiatry research, 152(2-3), 293-297. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2007.01.006]
34. Wang, A.-C., Chiang, J. T.-J., Tsai, C.-Y., Lin, T.-T., & Cheng, B.-S. (2013). Gender makes the difference: The moderating role of leader gender on the relationship between leadership styles and subordinate performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 101-113. [DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.06.001]
35. Woodhill, B. M., & Samuels, C. A. (2003). Positive and negative androgyny and their relationship with psychological health and well-being. Sex Roles, 48(11), 555-565. [DOI:10.1023/A:1023531530272]
36. Zosuls, K. M., Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., Miller, C. F., Gaertner, B. M., England, D. E., & Hill, A. P. (2011). 'It's not that we hate you': Understanding children's gender attitudes and expectancies about peer relationships. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 288-304. [DOI:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2010.02023.x]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
