Volume 4, Issue 3 (September 2025)
IJER 2025, 4(3): 1-11 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bordan Z, Mirzamani Bafghi S M, Farghadani A. (2025). A Structural Model of Marital Intimacy: The Roles of Alexithymia and Psychological Flexibility Mediated by Psychological Cohesion. IJER. 4(3), 1-11.
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-400-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-400-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Sav.C., Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran, zahra.bordan@iau.ac.ir
2- Department of Clinical Psychology, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ,mirzamani@bmsu.ac.ir
3- Department of psychology, Sav.C., Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran, Az.Farghadani@iau.ac.ir
2- Department of Clinical Psychology, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Department of psychology, Sav.C., Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran, Az.Farghadani@iau.ac.ir
Abstract: (1342 Views)
Objective: The present study aimed to develop a structural model of marital intimacy based on alexithymia and psychological flexibility, with the mediating role of psychological cohesion among married individuals.
Methods: This descriptive-correlational study was conducted on a statistical population comprising parents (men and women) aged 34 to 55 years, residing in Eslamshahr, who had children enrolled in lower secondary school in 2023. Using a multistage cluster sampling method, 443 individuals were selected as the research sample. Data were collected using the Marital Intimacy Questionnaire, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for psychological flexibility, the Marital Status Self-Report Scale, and the Sense of Coherence Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with SPSS-24 and AMOS-24 software.
Results: Findings indicated that the proposed structural model of marital intimacy based on alexithymia and psychological flexibility, mediated by psychological cohesion, demonstrated a good fit with the data. Moreover, both alexithymia and psychological flexibility predicted marital intimacy directly and indirectly through psychological cohesion among married individuals.
Conclusions: The results highlight the central role of psychological cohesion in strengthening marital intimacy, suggesting that both emotional alexithymia and psychological flexibility contribute to intimacy in marriage, both independently and through their influence on psychological cohesion.
Methods: This descriptive-correlational study was conducted on a statistical population comprising parents (men and women) aged 34 to 55 years, residing in Eslamshahr, who had children enrolled in lower secondary school in 2023. Using a multistage cluster sampling method, 443 individuals were selected as the research sample. Data were collected using the Marital Intimacy Questionnaire, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for psychological flexibility, the Marital Status Self-Report Scale, and the Sense of Coherence Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with SPSS-24 and AMOS-24 software.
Results: Findings indicated that the proposed structural model of marital intimacy based on alexithymia and psychological flexibility, mediated by psychological cohesion, demonstrated a good fit with the data. Moreover, both alexithymia and psychological flexibility predicted marital intimacy directly and indirectly through psychological cohesion among married individuals.
Conclusions: The results highlight the central role of psychological cohesion in strengthening marital intimacy, suggesting that both emotional alexithymia and psychological flexibility contribute to intimacy in marriage, both independently and through their influence on psychological cohesion.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Studies
Received: 2025/01/11 | Accepted: 2025/05/23 | Published: 2025/09/1
Received: 2025/01/11 | Accepted: 2025/05/23 | Published: 2025/09/1
References
1. Amanat, Z., Barzegar, M., Rezaei, A., & Bagholi, H. (2024). Investigating the Relationship between Attachment Styles and Academic Burnout: The Mediating Role of Alexithymia [Original]. Iranian Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 75-86. [DOI:10.22034/3.2.75]
2. Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social science & medicine, 36(6), 725-733. [DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-Z]
3. Bagarozzi, D. A. (1997). Marital intimacy needs questionnaire: Preliminary report. American Journal of Family Therapy, 25(3), 285-290. [DOI:10.1080/01926189708251073]
4. Barak, T., Levkovich, I., & Ayalon, L. (2024). Relationship intimacy in older couples when one partner has mild cognitive impairment: A qualitative study. Family Relations, 73(4), 2730-2744. [DOI:10.1111/fare.13014]
5. Doorley, J. D., Goodman, F. R., Kelso, K. C., & Kashdan, T. B. (2020). Psychological flexibility: What we know, what we do not know, and what we think we know. Social and personality psychology compass, 14(12), 1-11. [DOI:10.1111/spc3.12566]
6. Drnovšek, M., Örtqvist, D., & Wincent, J. (2010). The effectiveness of coping strategies used by entrepreneurs and their impact on personal well-being and venture performance. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 28(2), 193-220.
7. Du, X., Chaiviboontham, S., & Sumdaengrit, B. (2024). The experiences of Chinese colorectal cancer survivors in marital intimacy after ostomy creation: A qualitative study. Belitung Nursing Journal, 10(2), 222. [DOI:10.33546/bnj.3212]
8. Esmaili, S., Khayyer, M., & Mehryar, A. H. (2022). The Effectiveness of Psychological Empowerment Intervention on Personal Growth Initiative and Marital Boredom in Divorce-Asking Women. Iranian Evolutionary Educational Psychology Journal, 4(3), 564-572. [DOI:10.52547/ieepj.4.3.564]
9. Geyer, S. (1997). Some conceptual considerations on the sense of coherence. Social science & medicine, 44(12), 1771-1779. [DOI:10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00286-9]
10. Gomes, D., Jesus, M., Rosa, R., Bandeira, C., & Costa, C. A. d. (2022). Women in family farming: Evidence from a qualitative study in two Portuguese inner regions. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, 939590. [DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2022.939590]
11. Imani, Z., Motlagh, F. Z., & Abbasi, M. (2022). The Mediating role of Psychological Cohesion in the Relationship between Psychological Suffering and Spiritual Adjustment to Marital Turmoil in Mothers of Children with Autism. Islamic lifestyle with a focus on health, 6(1), 163-172. https://www.islamiilife.com/article_187763_3156b40d91c9095eabba3705461830cd.pdf
12. Kardan-Souraki, M., Hamzehgardeshi, Z., Asadpour, I., Mohammadpour, R. A., & Khani, S. (2015). A review of marital intimacy-enhancing interventions among married individuals. Global journal of health science, 8(8), 74. [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v8n8p74]
13. Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical psychology review, 30(7), 865-878. [DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001]
14. Knudsen, F. M., & Levin, M. E. (2024). Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II). In Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research (pp. 1-11). Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_134-1]
15. Kohlenberg, R. J., Kohlenberg, B., & Tsai, M. (2008). Intimacy. In A guide to functional analytic psychotherapy: Awareness, courage, love, and behaviorism (pp. 1-14). Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-09787-9_6]
16. Körük, S., & Özabacı, N. (2023). How do early maladaptive schemas and family functions predict dyadic marital adjustment? A test on Turkish married individuals. Journal of sex & marital therapy, 49(7), 772-782. [DOI:10.1080/0092623X.2023.2195857]
17. Leising, D., Grande, T., & Faber, R. (2009). The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20): A measure of general psychological distress. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), 707-710. [DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.009]
18. Mackinnon, S. P., & Hill, T. G. (2024). Romantic Relationships, Intimacy, and Generativity. The Development of Generativity across Adulthood, 230. [DOI:10.1093/9780191966309.003.0014]
19. Moksnes, U. K. (2021). Sense of coherence. Health promotion in health care-vital theories and research, 35-46. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-63135-2_4]
20. Monajati, S., Amini, N., & Jaafarinia, G. (2022). Predicting the Tendency to High-Risk Behaviors Based on Psychological Flexibility and Attachment Styles in Male and Female High School Students. Iranian Evolutionary Educational Psychology Journal, 4(1), 92-102. [DOI:10.52547/ieepj.4.1.92]
21. Nikrouy, F., Mohammadi, K., & Samavi, S. A. (2025). Structural relationship model of basic psychological needs with intimate partner violence: the mediating role of gender discrimination and self-esteem. Journal of interpersonal violence, 40(5-6), 1387-1411. [DOI:10.1177/08862605241259415]
22. Sedaghatkhah, A., Kajbafnejad, H., Chinaveh, M., & Aminimanesh, S. (2023). Predicting Marital Conflicts based on Alexithymia with the Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation. Iranian Evolutionary Educational Psychology Journal, 5(3), 298-310.
23. Tapp Jr, R. L. (2014). Concurrent relations between psychological flexibility and sexual satisfaction among committed couples. Spalding University.
24. Totenhagen, C. J., Li, X., Wilmarth, M. J., Archuleta, K. L., & Yorgason, J. B. (2024). Do couples who play together stay together? A longitudinal dyadic examination of shared leisure, financial distress, and relationship outcomes. Family Process, 63(1), 210-227. [DOI:10.1111/famp.12869]
25. Villeneuve, L., Trudel, G., Dargis, L., Préville, M., Boyer, R., & Bégin, J. (2014). Marital functioning and psychological distress among older couples over an 18-month period. Journal of sex & marital therapy, 40(3), 193-208. [DOI:10.1080/0092623X.2012.736919]
26. Whisman, M. A., Beach, S. R., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Is marital discord taxonic and can taxonic status be assessed reliably? Results from a national, representative sample of married couples. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 76(5), 745. [DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.76.5.745]
27. Zakhirehdari, N., Navabinejad, S., & Koraei, A. (2019). The effectiveness of cognitivebehavioral couple therapy on improving marriage performance and marital intimacy of couples. Medical science, 23(97), 290-293.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
