Volume 4, Issue 3 (September 2025)
IJER 2025, 4(3): 1-13 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abdulridha K H, Saadatmand Z, Khafeef E Q, Baratali M. (2025). Exploration and Validation of the Concept of Smartification among Primary School Students in Iraq. IJER. 4(3), 1-13.
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-421-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-421-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Curriculum planning, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran ,saadatmand@iau.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Dhi Qar University, Iraq
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran ,
3- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Dhi Qar University, Iraq
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract: (1417 Views)
Objective: The primary objective of this investigation was to critically examine and substantiate the notion of smartification within the context of Iraqi elementary school students.
Methods: The methodological framework employed was a mixed-method approach, encompassing a qualitative dimension rooted in the synthesis research model as delineated by Klein, alongside a quantitative dimension involving validation through consultations with domain experts in curriculum planning and media as well as information management. The field focus of the synthesis study aimed to elucidate the concept of smartification, utilizing reference texts that delineate the analysis of this concept. The sampling technique adopted in the synthesis study was purposive. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively through the synthesis study methodology, while the quantitative analysis was performed utilizing the Lawshe coefficient (Content Validity Ratio).
Results: The analysis of the survey responses indicated that the management system encompasses various domains including the administration of school affairs, management of educational resources, human resource management, financial resource oversight, equipment management, technological infrastructure, and security measures; the teaching and learning environment is intricately linked to the curriculum, educational content, pedagogical approaches, educational materials and equipment, as well as evaluation and implementation factors; empowerment is associated with the development of student competencies, teacher capabilities, staff qualifications, managerial skills, and professional development courses; hardware is connected to essential equipment, peripheral devices, communication technologies, and resource centers; while software pertains to content management systems, communication applications, educational software, administrative software, and security and support systems.
Conclusions: The outcomes of this research may serve as a foundation for the conceptualization of smart learning environments within Iraqi educational institutions.
Methods: The methodological framework employed was a mixed-method approach, encompassing a qualitative dimension rooted in the synthesis research model as delineated by Klein, alongside a quantitative dimension involving validation through consultations with domain experts in curriculum planning and media as well as information management. The field focus of the synthesis study aimed to elucidate the concept of smartification, utilizing reference texts that delineate the analysis of this concept. The sampling technique adopted in the synthesis study was purposive. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively through the synthesis study methodology, while the quantitative analysis was performed utilizing the Lawshe coefficient (Content Validity Ratio).
Results: The analysis of the survey responses indicated that the management system encompasses various domains including the administration of school affairs, management of educational resources, human resource management, financial resource oversight, equipment management, technological infrastructure, and security measures; the teaching and learning environment is intricately linked to the curriculum, educational content, pedagogical approaches, educational materials and equipment, as well as evaluation and implementation factors; empowerment is associated with the development of student competencies, teacher capabilities, staff qualifications, managerial skills, and professional development courses; hardware is connected to essential equipment, peripheral devices, communication technologies, and resource centers; while software pertains to content management systems, communication applications, educational software, administrative software, and security and support systems.
Conclusions: The outcomes of this research may serve as a foundation for the conceptualization of smart learning environments within Iraqi educational institutions.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Studies
Received: 2025/04/16 | Accepted: 2025/07/17 | Published: 2025/09/10
Received: 2025/04/16 | Accepted: 2025/07/17 | Published: 2025/09/10
References
1. AkbarKhansari, A., Sharifirad, G., Khoshgoftar Moghadam, A., & Rahmani, J. (2023). Competency Evaluation Model for Primary Schools Principals. Iranian Evolutionary Educational Psychology Journal, 5(2), 245-260. [DOI:10.61186/ieepj.5.2.245]
2. Albu, G. (2015). Interrogative style in the subsequent development of school Case Study. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 180, 1548-1554. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.305]
3. Alcorn, S. R., & Cheesman, M. J. (2022). Technology-assisted viva voce exams: A novel approach aimed at addressing student anxiety and assessor burden in oral assessment. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 14(5), 664-670. [DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2022.04.009]
4. Bajaj, R., & Sharma, V. (2018). Smart Education with artificial intelligence based determination of learning styles. Procedia computer science, 132, 834-842. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.095]
5. Behjatiardakani, F., Azizi, S., & Rezapour, Y. (2018). A study of the impact of smartening schools on creativity and academic achievement among sixth grade students. International Journal of Educational and Psychological Researches, 4(2), 59-59.
6. Correia, K., & Marques-Pinto, A. (2016). Adaptation in the transition to school: perspectives of parents, preschool and primary school teachers. Educational Research, 58(3), 247-264. [DOI:10.1080/00131881.2016.1200255]
7. Einarsdottir, J. (2006). From pre‐school to primary school: When different contexts meet. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 165-184. [DOI:10.1080/00313830600575965]
8. Elango, S., García, J. L., Heckman, J. J., & Hojman, A. (2015). Early childhood education. In Economics of means-tested transfer programs in the United States, volume 2 (pp. 235-297). University of Chicago Press. [DOI:10.3386/w21766]
9. Farahani, M., & Khoda Bande Loo, R. (2016). Studying the impact of standardized educational multimedia in the cognitive theory framework on the degree of the student s' learning & Attitude to the course in distance education centers. Educational Technologies in Learning, 2(7), 59-79. [DOI:10.22054/jti.2019.3210.1067]
10. Felini Ed D, D. (2014). Quality media literacy education. A tool for teachers and teacher educators of Italian elementary schools. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 6(1), 3. [DOI:10.23860/jmle-6-1-3]
11. Huh, K., & Lee, J. (2020). Fostering creativity and language skills of foreign language learners through SMART learning environments: Evidence from fifth‐grade Korean EFL learners. Tesol Journal, 11(2), e489. [DOI:10.1002/tesj.489]
12. Ibrahim, M. S., Razak, A. Z. A., & Kenayathulla, H. B. (2013). Smart principals and smart schools. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 103, 826-836. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.404]
13. Jahani, J., Mazaheri, R., Mohamadi, M., & Shafiei, M. (2020). The development and validation of teaching-learning process instrument in smart schools in educational system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 14(3), 493-505.
14. Li, B., Kong, S. C., & Chen, G. (2015). Development and validation of the smart classroom inventory. Smart Learning Environments, 2(1), 3. [DOI:10.1186/s40561-015-0012-0]
15. Mogas, J., Palau, R., Fuentes, M., & Cebrián, G. (2022). Smart schools on the way: How school principals from Catalonia approach the future of education within the fourth industrial revolution. Learning Environments Research, 25(3), 875-893. [DOI:10.1007/s10984-021-09398-3]
16. Pan, R., Zhang, L., & Yang, J. (2022). A systematic review of smart learning environments. International Conference on Smart Learning Environments, [DOI:10.1007/978-981-19-5967-7_3]
17. Potter, W. J. (2013). Review of literature on media literacy. Sociology Compass, 7(6), 417-435. [DOI:10.1111/soc4.12041]
18. Sekarasih, L., Scharrer, E., Olson, C., Onut, G., & Lanthorn, K. (2018). Effectiveness of a school-based media literacy curriculum in encouraging critical attitudes about advertising content and forms among boys and girls. Journal of Advertising, 47(4), 362-377. [DOI:10.1080/00913367.2018.1545269]
19. Seraji, F., & Soleimani, F. (2016). Analysis of ICT integration (cyber spacing) obstacles at implementation stage based on educational innovation theories in schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 11(42), 153-176. https://www.jcsicsa.ir/article_60634_ca18d31048f73826f47588487e8267ab.pdf
20. Singh, H., & Miah, S. J. (2020). Smart education literature: A theoretical analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3299-3328. [DOI:10.1007/s10639-020-10116-4]
21. Soltani, M. (2012). The structure of smart schools in the educational system. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(6), 6250-6254.
22. Tan, X., Lin, X., & Zhuang, R. (2024). Development and validation of a secondary vocational school students' digital learning competence scale. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 37. [DOI:10.1186/s40561-024-00325-6]
23. Varela-Candamio, L., Novo-Corti, I., & García-Álvarez, M. T. (2018). The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1565-1578. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.214]
24. Yamijala, S. M. S., Chodisetty, R. M., Chakravorty, C., & Sai, K. P. (2025). AI-powered learning revolutionizing smart education with personalized learning styles. In Internet of Behavior-Based Computational Intelligence for Smart Education Systems (pp. 191-212). IGI Global. [DOI:10.4018/979-8-3693-8151-9.ch007]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
