Volume 2, Issue 2 (June 2023)
IJER 2023, 2(2): 15-26 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Honarasa P. (2023). Prediction the Academic Self-efficacy based on Incremental Intelligence Mindset, Motivational Beliefs and Academic Competence. IJER. 2(2), 15-26. doi:10.22034/2.2.15
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-62-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-62-en.html
Ph.D. in Psychology, Fars General Directorate of Education, Shiraz, Iran , Honarasa.parisa@gmail.com
Abstract: (843 Views)
Objective: This study investigates the interplay between incremental intelligence mindset, motivational beliefs, academic competence, and academic self-efficacy among university students. The primary objective is to explore how these psychological factors collectively influence academic adjustment
Methods: In a correlation study, a sample of university students (n=300) from Islamic Azad University of Marvdasht, participated in the research, providing responses to validated self-report questionnaires.
Results: The results reveal that the proposed model, consisting of incremental intelligence mindset, motivational beliefs, and academic competence, significantly explains academic adjustment (F=8.52, p<0.001). Furthermore, the model explains 47.9% of the variance in academic self-efficacy (R-squared=0.49). Specifically, incremental intelligence mindset (β=0.25, p<0.001), motivational beliefs (β=0.38, p<0.01), and academic competence (β=0.23, p<0.010) positively and significantly predict academic self-efficacy.
Conclusions: These findings highlight the substantial impact of these factors on students' self-perceived academic efficacy. The implications of these results are profound for educational institutions and practitioners. Understanding the influential role of incremental intelligence mindset, motivational beliefs, and academic competence in shaping academic self-efficacy can inform targeted interventions to enhance students' academic experiences and outcomes.
Methods: In a correlation study, a sample of university students (n=300) from Islamic Azad University of Marvdasht, participated in the research, providing responses to validated self-report questionnaires.
Results: The results reveal that the proposed model, consisting of incremental intelligence mindset, motivational beliefs, and academic competence, significantly explains academic adjustment (F=8.52, p<0.001). Furthermore, the model explains 47.9% of the variance in academic self-efficacy (R-squared=0.49). Specifically, incremental intelligence mindset (β=0.25, p<0.001), motivational beliefs (β=0.38, p<0.01), and academic competence (β=0.23, p<0.010) positively and significantly predict academic self-efficacy.
Conclusions: These findings highlight the substantial impact of these factors on students' self-perceived academic efficacy. The implications of these results are profound for educational institutions and practitioners. Understanding the influential role of incremental intelligence mindset, motivational beliefs, and academic competence in shaping academic self-efficacy can inform targeted interventions to enhance students' academic experiences and outcomes.
Keywords: Academic Self-efficacy, Incremental Intelligence Mindset, Motivational Beliefs, University Students, Academic Competence
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Studies
Received: 2023/01/14 | Accepted: 2023/05/22 | Published: 2023/06/1
Received: 2023/01/14 | Accepted: 2023/05/22 | Published: 2023/06/1
References
1. Adamsone, I., Gudakovska, N., & Svence, G. (2020). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: Review of two studies in Latvia.". Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century, 14(1), 7-17. [DOI:10.33225/ppc/20.14.07]
2. Akanni, A. A., & Oduaran, C. A. (2019). Depression, self-esteem and sociodemographic determinants of suicidal ideation among university undergraduates. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8, 100-104. [DOI:10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.10]
3. Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2003). The development of competence-related and motivational beliefs: An investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 111. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.111]
4. Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of social sciences, literature and languages, 1(1), 9-16.
5. Arnold, M., Nott, B., & Meinhold, J. (2012). The positive youth development inventory full version. Manuscrito não publicado, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA.
6. Baird, N., Robertson, J. L., & McLarnon, M. J. (2022). Looking in the Mirror: Including the Reflected Best Self Exercise in Management Curricula to Increase Students' Interview Self-Efficacy. Academy of Management Learning & Education(ja), AMLE. 20210347. [DOI:10.5465/amle.2021.0347]
7. Bong, M. (2004). Academic motivation in self-efficacy, task value, achievement goal orientations, and attributional beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 287-298. [DOI:10.3200/JOER.97.6.287-298]
8. Buch, R., Säfvenbom, R., & Boe, O. (2015). The relationships between academic self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and perceived competence. Journal of Military Studies, 6(1), 19-35. [DOI:10.1515/jms-2016-0195]
9. Buenconsejo, J. U., & Datu, J. A. D. (2020). Growth and fixed mindsets about talent matter for career development self-efficacy in selected Filipino adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105470. [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105470]
10. Buhs, E. S. (2005). Peer rejection, negative peer treatment, and school adjustment: Self-concept and classroom engagement as mediating processes. Journal of School Psychology, 43(5), 407-424. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.09.001]
11. Costa, A., & Faria, L. (2018). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 829. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829]
12. Costa, A., & Faria, L. (2023). Trajectories of implicit theories of intelligence and emotional intelligence in secondary school. Social Psychology of Education, 26(1), 191-209. [DOI:10.1007/s11218-022-09695-6]
13. Delgado, M. Y., Ettekal, A. V., Simpkins, S. D., & Schaefer, D. R. (2016). How do my friends matter? Examining Latino adolescents' friendships, school belonging, and academic achievement. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45, 1110-1125. [DOI:10.1007/s10964-015-0341-x]
14. Dotterer, A. M., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence, 40, 1649-1660. [DOI:10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5]
15. Dweck, C. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. Development of achievement motivation, 57-88. [DOI:10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50005-X]
16. Eakman, A. M., Kinney, A. R., Schierl, M. L., & Henry, K. L. (2019). Academic performance in student service members/veterans: Effects of instructor autonomy support, academic self-efficacy and academic problems. Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1005-1026. [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2019.1605048]
17. Esmaeili, L., Sohrabi, N., Mehryar, A. H., & Khayyer, M. (2019). A causal model of motivational beliefs with the mediating role of academic hope on academic Self-Efficacy in high school students. Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology Journal, 1(3), 179-185. [DOI:10.29252/ieepj.1.3.179]
18. Gutiérrez, M., & Tomás, J. M. (2019). The role of perceived autonomy support in predicting university students' academic success mediated by academic self-efficacy and school engagement. Educational Psychology, 39(6), 729-748. [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2019.1566519]
19. Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational research review, 17, 63-84. [DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002]
20. Khalkhali, V., & Aryanpour, H. R. (2013). Comparing the academic self-efficacy in students with entity and incremental intelligence theory. Education Sciences & Psychology, 23(1).
21. Lackey, C. J. (2014). Relationships between motivation, self-efficacy, mindsets, attributions, and learning strategies: An exploratory study. Illinois State University.
22. Li, W., Gao, W., & Sha, J. (2020). Perceived teacher autonomy support and school engagement of Tibetan students in elementary and middle schools: Mediating effect of self-efficacy and academic emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 50. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00050]
23. Lombardo, E., & Kantola, J. (2021). Social constructivism. In The Routledge handbook of gender and EU politics (pp. 43-55). Routledge London. [DOI:10.4324/9781351049955-5]
24. Louis, R. A., & Mistele, J. M. (2012). The differences in scores and self-efficacy by student gender in mathematics and science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1163-1190. [DOI:10.1007/s10763-011-9325-9]
25. Nielsen, T., Friderichsen, I. S., & Hartkopf, B. T. (2019). Measuring Academic Learning and Exam Self-Efficacy at Admission to University and Its Relation to First-Year Attrition: An IRT-Based Multi-Program Validity Study. Frontline Learning Research, 7(3), 91-118. [DOI:10.14786/flr.v7i3.503]
26. Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1994). Self-regulated learning in college students: Knowledge, strategies, and motivation. Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie, 113-133.
27. Sarwar, M. N., Ashfaq, M., & Maqbool, A. (2022). Effect of Implicit Theories of Intelligencee on Students' Achievement in the Subject of Mathematics at Elementary School Level. sjesr, 5(4), 78-84. [DOI:10.36902/sjesr-vol5-iss4-2022(78-84)]
28. Su, A., Wan, S., He, W., & Dong, L. (2021). Effect of intelligence mindsets on math achievement for Chinese primary school students: math self-efficacy and failure beliefs as mediators. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 640349. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640349]
29. Vechiu, A.-P., & Popa, N. L. (2022). 5. Implicit Theories of Intelligence and School Performance. A Systematic Review. Review of Artistic Education, 24(1), 272-285. [DOI:10.2478/rae-2022-0033]
30. Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child development, 1198-1209. [DOI:10.2307/1132301]
31. Wright, C. L., & Levitt, M. J. (2014). Parental absence, academic competence, and expectations in Latino immigrant youth. Journal of Family Issues, 35(13), 1754-1779. [DOI:10.1177/0192513X13482126]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
