Volume 3, Issue 4 (December 2024)
IJER 2024, 3(4): 231-252 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rostami Kia A, Maleki Avarsin S, Yari Haj Atalo J. (2024). Presenting a Model of Decentralization for Iran's Education. IJER. 3(4), 231-252. doi:10.22034/3.4.231
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-206-en.html
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-206-en.html
1- PhD student in Education Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Human and Educational Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Associate Professor of Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Educational Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran ,s.maleki@iaut.ac.ir
3- Assistant Professor of Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Educational Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Associate Professor of Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Educational Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran ,
3- Assistant Professor of Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Educational Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: (342 Views)
Objective: The present study was undertaken with the objective of developing a theoretical framework predicated upon the determinants influencing the decentralization of education in Iran.
Methods: In the course of this investigation, both internal and external determinants pertinent to the decentralization of educational systems were delineated. This study employed a qualitative methodological approach, specifically utilizing inductive content analysis. The qualitative segment of the study encompassed a statistical population comprised of experts specializing in educational management, as well as education administrators from the provinces of East Azerbaijan and West Azerbaijan. From this cohort, a selection of 20 knowledgeable experts with substantial experience in educational management was made through purposeful sampling. These individuals engaged in research interviews that were conducted in a semi-structured format. The dependability of the interviews was substantiated by soliciting evaluations from professionals in the domain of educational management. The data obtained from the interviews were meticulously analyzed and systematically coded.
Results: The outcomes of the final conceptual framework revealed that the factors identified within the qualitative component encompassed both internal and external variables influencing the decentralization of education in Iran. Out of the 858 identified indicators, 28 primary components were discerned, and these dimensions and components were subsequently designated in accordance with the prevailing literature, context, and theoretical frameworks.
Conclusions: By leveraging the insights garnered from these findings, a model was articulated, emphasizing the critical factors underlying the decentralization of education in Iran.
Methods: In the course of this investigation, both internal and external determinants pertinent to the decentralization of educational systems were delineated. This study employed a qualitative methodological approach, specifically utilizing inductive content analysis. The qualitative segment of the study encompassed a statistical population comprised of experts specializing in educational management, as well as education administrators from the provinces of East Azerbaijan and West Azerbaijan. From this cohort, a selection of 20 knowledgeable experts with substantial experience in educational management was made through purposeful sampling. These individuals engaged in research interviews that were conducted in a semi-structured format. The dependability of the interviews was substantiated by soliciting evaluations from professionals in the domain of educational management. The data obtained from the interviews were meticulously analyzed and systematically coded.
Results: The outcomes of the final conceptual framework revealed that the factors identified within the qualitative component encompassed both internal and external variables influencing the decentralization of education in Iran. Out of the 858 identified indicators, 28 primary components were discerned, and these dimensions and components were subsequently designated in accordance with the prevailing literature, context, and theoretical frameworks.
Conclusions: By leveraging the insights garnered from these findings, a model was articulated, emphasizing the critical factors underlying the decentralization of education in Iran.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Studies
Received: 2024/01/19 | Accepted: 2024/05/23 | Published: 2024/12/1
Received: 2024/01/19 | Accepted: 2024/05/23 | Published: 2024/12/1
References
1. Amin Beidokhti, A., Fathi, K., & Moradi, S. (2017). Structural Analysis of Parameters of School-Based Management on Comparative Theorization. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 8(29), 27-50. https://jedu.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_2315_961a3a73bbb3715dd189f8e0c616624a.pdf
2. Amin Khandaghi, M., & Dehghani, M. (2011). Reflection on Centralization, Decentralization and Recentralization and Explanation of Their Implications For Iran's Curriculum System: A New Perspective. Foundations of Education, 011(2), -. [DOI:10.22067/fe.v11i2.2495]
3. Camelia, S., Vladimir-Aurelian, E., & Cătălin, D. R. (2014). The impact of decentralization on the Romanian school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 69-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.461]
4. Fatholahi, E., & Alizadeh, M. (2023). Financial Decentralization and Higher Education From an Economic and Educational Perspective. Iranian Economic Development Analyses, 9(1), 193-220. [DOI:10.22051/ieda.2023.44935.1368]
5. Fatholahi, E., Alizadeh, M., & Saadatmehr, M. (2022). The effect of financial decentralization on the quality of education in the provinces of Iran: A panel co-integration approach. Journal of Econometric Modelling, 7(1), 39-69. [DOI:10.22075/jem.2022.26785.1718]
6. Ghafari, M., & Rostampor, M. (2021). The ratio of centralism and good governance in the ninth and tenth governments [Research]. Political Research In Islamic World, 11(1), 139-161. http://priw.ir/article-1-1365-fa.html
7. Haghighi, M. (2012). The role of decentralization and delegation of authority in the structure of education. Educational Research Journal, 11, 57-74.
8. Hasanbandi, H. B., Farhadi Rad, H., & Rahimidoost, G. H. (2022). The Identifying and structural analyzing Good Governance drivers in Iran's Education System using cross-impact analysis approach. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 13(2), 87-107. [DOI:10.30495/jedu.2022.27834.5577]
9. Kaewkumkong, A., & Jaiborisudhi, W. (2021). Educational decentralization policies in Thailand and South Korea: a comparative study. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 42(1), 165-170-165-170. [DOI:10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.1.26]
10. Kameshwara, K. K., Sandoval-Hernandez, A., Shields, R., & Dhanda, K. R. (2020). A false promise? Decentralization in education systems across the globe. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101669. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101669]
11. Karimi, M. S., Hoveida, R., & Siadat, S. (2023). Paradigm Model of Decentralization of the Iranian Education System. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 16(1), 125-150.
12. KHodaverdi Samani, M., alizadeh, m., & Fotros, M. H. (2021). Investigating the effect of financial decentralization on the efficiency of educational services in the provinces of Iran during the years 1385-1397: Spatial econometrics approach. Journal of Econometric Modelling, 6(2), 147-177. [DOI:10.22075/jem.2021.24064.1624]
13. Kyriacou, A. P., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2019). Local decentralization and the quality of public services in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 145(2), 755-776. [DOI:10.1007/s11205-019-02113-z]
14. Maleki, H., & Agha Mohammadi, J. (2015). Centralization and Decentralization in the Educational Development Planning Process: : Challenges and Obstacles. Journal of Work and Society, 7, 60-66.
15. McGinn, N., & Welsh, T. (1999). Decentralization of education: why, when, what and how? Paris: International institute of educational planning. Retrieved June, 8, 2010.
16. Mohammadi, N., Haji, G., & Fotros, M. H. (2020). The Impact of Combined Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth in Proviences of Iran. Economic Growth and Development Research, 10(38), 98-75. [DOI:10.30473/egdr.2019.46573.5221]
17. Sow, M., & Razafimahefa, M. I. F. (2015). Fiscal decentralization and the efficiency of public service delivery. International Monetary Fund. [DOI:10.5089/9781484351116.001]
18. Welch-Devine, M. (2012). Searching for success: defining success in co-management. Human organization, 71(4), 358-370. [DOI:10.17730/humo.71.4.y048347510304870]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International. |
