Volume 4, Issue 2 (June 2025)                   IJER 2025, 4(2): 1-32 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Seyyedein Navan S F, Javadi Pour M, Salehi K. (2025). A Pathological Study of the Existing Issues in the Teaching-Learning Process of Humanities Students at Islamic Azad University (Science and Research Branch) from the Perspective of Students. IJER. 4(2), 1-32.
URL: http://ijer.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-372-en.html
1- Ph.D. Student, Department of Curriculum Planning, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Methods, Educational Planning and Curriculum, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran. Iran , javadipour@ut.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor, Department of Methods, Educational Planning and Curriculum, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran. Iran
Abstract:   (1534 Views)
Objective: The teaching-learning process is a complex interplay of pedagogical methods, educational content, and institutional resources, necessitating a thorough examination of students' perspectives to identify deficiencies and inform effective improvements in higher education settings.
Methods: The present study employed grounded theory methodology at the conceptual organization level to examine the issues involved in the teaching-learning process at the College of Humanities in Islamic Azad University (Science & Research Branch) from the perspective of students. A purposive sampling method was utilized by conducting semi-structured interviews with 15 students (5 males and 10 females).
Results: Based on the thematic analyses of the collected data, a set of themes emerged regarding the students' perceptions of deficiencies in the teaching-learning processes, encompassing five main categories and 16 subcategories. The identified themes revealed students' viewpoints and experiences regarding challenges in teaching methods, educational content, interaction with faculty, facilities and resources, and assessment methods.
Conclusions: In summary, the study identified significant deficiencies in the teaching-learning processes suggesting that targeted improvements in teaching methods, resource allocation, and interaction could enhance educational effectiveness and student engagement.
Full-Text [PDF 594 kb]   (791 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Educational Studies
Received: 2025/01/15 | Accepted: 2025/04/25 | Published: 2025/06/1

References
1. Ababaf, Z. (2017). Curriculum knowledge of faculty members: Neglected professional competency in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 7(14), 103-130. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25382241.1395.7.14.6.3
2. Ahmadi, P., & Gharib Tazreh, S. (2022). Relationship between Curriculum Components of University Students, Business Quality and Academic Satisfaction, Psychology and Educational Sciences. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 13(25), 7-27. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25382241.1401.13.25.3.4
3. Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers' perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 920317. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317]
4. Cheng, E. C. (2021). Knowledge transfer strategies and practices for higher education institutions. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 51(2), 288-301. [DOI:10.1108/VJIKMS-11-2019-0184]
5. Conzemius, A., & O'neill, J. (2001). Building shared responsibility for student learning. ASCD.
6. Craig, C. J. (2006). Why is dissemination so difficult? The nature of teacher knowledge and the spread of curriculum reform. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 257-293. [DOI:10.3102/00028312043002257]
7. Darabi, S., Azizi, N., Salimi, J., & Shirbegi, N. (2021). Design and validation of instrument for evaluating indicators of pedagogy in sustainable teaching-learning process in higher education. Research in Medical Education, 13(4), 1-13. http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-1118-en.html [DOI:10.52547/rme.13.4.1]
8. Ebrahimi, A., Mirshah Jafari, S. E., & Rabbani Khoorasgani, A. (2023). Identification and explanation of proportional teaching-learning strategies to the generational characteristics of today's undergraduate students. New Educational Approaches, 17(2), 63-86. 10.22108/NEA.2023.134910.1822
9. Fathi Azar, E. (2020). Principles and methods of teaching. Tabriz University Press.
10. Ghorbani, M. A., Zaferani, R. Z., Imani, M. N., Ghorbani, M. A., & Imani, M. N. (2023). Designing a conceptual model of innovative educational methods in higher education (Case study of Islamic Azad University of Tehran province). Islamic Life Style, 7 (2), 218-226.
11. Jafari, F. (2022). Feedback. Iranian Journal of Medical Education (22), 240-241. [DOI:10.48305/22.21]
12. Janssen, E. M., Mainhard, T., Buisman, R. S., Verkoeijen, P. P., Heijltjes, A. E., Van Peppen, L. M., & Van Gog, T. (2019). Training higher education teachers' critical thinking and attitudes towards teaching it. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 310-322. [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.007]
13. Kalam, A., & Hossain, M. A. (2023). Effects of quality of higher education on student satisfaction and the institutional image. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 31(4), 471-492. [DOI:10.1504/IJBIR.2023.134146]
14. Kaveh, K., Aghahosseini, T., & Fadavi, M. S. (2023). Identify of pathology components of knowledge production in Islamic Azad University. Sociology of Education, 9(1), 79-90. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23221445.1402.9.1.8.3
15. Khadivi, A., Seyyedkalan. S. M., Hossein, P. T., Ahmadi, H., & Tarehbari. H. (2018). Affecting factors on teaching and education quality in Farhangian university (Case study: College of Ardabil). Scientific Journal of Instruction and Assessment, 42, 161-185. https://journals.iau.ir/article_543447.html?lang=en
16. Masuku, M. M., Jili, N. N., & Sabela, P. T. (2021). Assessment as a pedagogy and measuring tool in promoting deep learning in institutions of higher learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(2), 274-283. [DOI:10.5430/ijhe.v10n2p274]
17. Mousavi, F.S., & Tohidi, S. (2022). The impact of flipped learning methods on increasing student engagement in Experimental Science classes. Journal of Study and Innovation in Education and Development, 1 (2), 1-10. [DOI:10.61838/jsied.2.1.4]
18. Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: a literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(1), 1-4. [DOI:10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102]
19. Okolie, U. C., Nwosu, H. E., & Mlanga, S. (2019). Graduate employability: How the higher education institutions can meet the demand of the labour market. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 9(4), 620-636. [DOI:10.1108/HESWBL-09-2018-0089]
20. Parsa, A., Akidi, M., & Elhampoor, H. (2020). The role of curricula in the development of job skills, job expectations and employment chances from the viewpoints of agricultural students and graduates. Agricultural Education Administration Research, 12(53), 162-183.
21. Rezaei, H. H., & Vahdat, R. (2018). The comparison of the effect of study and planning training through using electronic content and traditional method on academic achievement in Biology courses. Scientific Journal of Instruction and Assessment, 40, 27-41. https://journals.iau.ir/article_538058.html
22. Seyfried, M. & Ansmann, M. (2018). Unfreezing higher education institutions? Understanding the introduction of quality management in teaching and learning in Germany. Higher Education, 75(6), 1061-1076. [DOI:10.1007/s10734-017-0185-2]
23. Shahzad, K., & Ahmadkhan, S. (2023). Effects of e-learning technologies on university librarians and libraries: a systematic literature review. The Electronic Library, 41(4), 528-554. [DOI:10.1108/EL-04-2023-0076]
24. Soltani, R., & Shamsi, M. (2024). Students' evaluation of the method of designing, implementing and providing constructive feedback by the professor on the satisfaction and attitude of the students towards the perceived academic success. Development Strategies in Medical Education, 11(3), 249-262.
25. Stensaker, B. (2017). Academic development as cultural work: Responding to the organizational complexity of modern higher education institutions. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), 274-285. [DOI:10.1080/1360144X.2017.1366322]
26. Talan, T., & Gulsecen, S. (2019). The effect of a flipped classroom on students' achievements, academic engagement and satisfaction levels. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 31-60. [DOI:10.17718/tojde.640503]
27. Zaakiyyah, H. K. A. (2024). Innovative strategies to enhance the quality of higher education management: Human resource development and the critical role of communication. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 2(1), 331-336. [DOI:10.61100/adman.v2i1.128]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International.

The Iranian Journal of Educational Research (IJER) is licensed under the Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb